<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Spiritual Friendship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spiritualfriendship.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spiritualfriendship.org</link>
	<description>Musings on God, friendship, relationships</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:43:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On my honor: Reflections from a gay Eagle Scout by Lion IRC</title>
		<link>http://spiritualfriendship.org/2013/05/19/on-my-honor-reflections-from-a-gay-eagle-scout/#comment-1263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lion IRC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritualfriendship.org/?p=416#comment-1263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it is a great policy to keep matters of sexuality OUT of organizations run by adults which involve positions of power over children.

What is it with the adult fixation on identifying boys in the boy scouts as homosexuals? Is it the gay lobby that wants to [homo]sexualize children from an early age? I find it offensive that adult men contemplate such things.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is a great policy to keep matters of sexuality OUT of organizations run by adults which involve positions of power over children.</p>
<p>What is it with the adult fixation on identifying boys in the boy scouts as homosexuals? Is it the gay lobby that wants to [homo]sexualize children from an early age? I find it offensive that adult men contemplate such things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On my honor: Reflections from a gay Eagle Scout by Rev. mathew Andersen</title>
		<link>http://spiritualfriendship.org/2013/05/19/on-my-honor-reflections-from-a-gay-eagle-scout/#comment-1259</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rev. mathew Andersen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritualfriendship.org/?p=416#comment-1259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you,

I am deeply ashamed that the President of my own denomination, the Lutheran Church -Missouri Synod, has decided to publicly oppose a policy change in the BSA that would benefit many boys struggling with sexual identity.  I am, however, deeply gratified to see young men such as yourself and the others who post on this board who are willing to deal with the issue openly, honestly and in accord with God&#039;s Word. It gives me great hope for the future of the Church.  I am also glad scouting gave you such benefits and hope that it will continue to give many other young men the same support and foundation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you,</p>
<p>I am deeply ashamed that the President of my own denomination, the Lutheran Church -Missouri Synod, has decided to publicly oppose a policy change in the BSA that would benefit many boys struggling with sexual identity.  I am, however, deeply gratified to see young men such as yourself and the others who post on this board who are willing to deal with the issue openly, honestly and in accord with God&#8217;s Word. It gives me great hope for the future of the Church.  I am also glad scouting gave you such benefits and hope that it will continue to give many other young men the same support and foundation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On my honor: Reflections from a gay Eagle Scout by On My Honor: Reflections From a Gay Eagle Scout &#124; Eleison</title>
		<link>http://spiritualfriendship.org/2013/05/19/on-my-honor-reflections-from-a-gay-eagle-scout/#comment-1257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[On My Honor: Reflections From a Gay Eagle Scout &#124; Eleison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 21:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritualfriendship.org/?p=416#comment-1257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] have a guest post up over at the Spiritual Friendship Blog on my time in the Boy Scouts. Also, spend some time [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] have a guest post up over at the Spiritual Friendship Blog on my time in the Boy Scouts. Also, spend some time [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Destinations of Love by EssEm</title>
		<link>http://spiritualfriendship.org/2013/05/17/the-destinations-of-love/#comment-1253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EssEm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritualfriendship.org/?p=413#comment-1253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have long ceased to believe that Catholicism and a self-affirming homo-eros are at all compatible. I chose the latter. But I think gay marriage is a mistake, for many reasons. For one, from an internally gay perspective, it is heterosexism in drag, forcing male/male love (my interest) into a structure not suited to it. The current obsession with it by the LGBT herd reduces it to a power and status move and shows a damning lack both of creativity and honesty.

There is a hard to name combination of friend, lover and kinsman which I recognize as what I want both to be and to have. But &quot;husband&quot; it is not. Men have their own natural forms. See Miller &amp; Donovan&#039;s &quot;Blood Brotherhood &amp; Other Rites of Male Alliance.&quot;

WERE the Catholic tradition able to accept same-sex love and institutionalize it, my fantasy would be to have it somewhat parallel not to marriage but to religious vows: a sacramental, not a sacrament. No Catholic thinks a monk&#039;s vows less worthy than a husband&#039;s but the difference is recognized instinctually and theologically. This (very fantasy) state would enable the honoring of male/male love as itself, on its own terms, not as a hand-me-down of matrimony. Marriage, which I honor, is about family, about children. The love of men for each other is about friendship, as you say.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have long ceased to believe that Catholicism and a self-affirming homo-eros are at all compatible. I chose the latter. But I think gay marriage is a mistake, for many reasons. For one, from an internally gay perspective, it is heterosexism in drag, forcing male/male love (my interest) into a structure not suited to it. The current obsession with it by the LGBT herd reduces it to a power and status move and shows a damning lack both of creativity and honesty.</p>
<p>There is a hard to name combination of friend, lover and kinsman which I recognize as what I want both to be and to have. But &#8220;husband&#8221; it is not. Men have their own natural forms. See Miller &amp; Donovan&#8217;s &#8220;Blood Brotherhood &amp; Other Rites of Male Alliance.&#8221;</p>
<p>WERE the Catholic tradition able to accept same-sex love and institutionalize it, my fantasy would be to have it somewhat parallel not to marriage but to religious vows: a sacramental, not a sacrament. No Catholic thinks a monk&#8217;s vows less worthy than a husband&#8217;s but the difference is recognized instinctually and theologically. This (very fantasy) state would enable the honoring of male/male love as itself, on its own terms, not as a hand-me-down of matrimony. Marriage, which I honor, is about family, about children. The love of men for each other is about friendship, as you say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spiritual friendship in 300 words by The Destinations of Love &#187; First Thoughts &#124; A First Things Blog</title>
		<link>http://spiritualfriendship.org/2012/08/29/spiritual-friendship-in-300-words/#comment-1252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Destinations of Love &#187; First Thoughts &#124; A First Things Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritualfriendship.org/?p=251#comment-1252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] to have a place, a destination—is something several of us are trying to explore with regard to a theology of friendship. Rauch was not alone, as a young person, in believing that if he acknowledged his sexual [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to have a place, a destination—is something several of us are trying to explore with regard to a theology of friendship. Rauch was not alone, as a young person, in believing that if he acknowledged his sexual [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spiritual friendship in 300 words by The Destinations of Love &#124; Spiritual Friendship</title>
		<link>http://spiritualfriendship.org/2012/08/29/spiritual-friendship-in-300-words/#comment-1251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Destinations of Love &#124; Spiritual Friendship]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritualfriendship.org/?p=251#comment-1251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] to have a place, a destination—is something several of us are trying to explore with regard to a theology of friendship. Rauch was not alone, as a young person, in believing that if he acknowledged his sexual [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to have a place, a destination—is something several of us are trying to explore with regard to a theology of friendship. Rauch was not alone, as a young person, in believing that if he acknowledged his sexual [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Day of Silence 2013 by Lion IRC</title>
		<link>http://spiritualfriendship.org/2013/04/19/day-of-silence-2013/#comment-1248</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lion IRC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 01:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritualfriendship.org/?p=359#comment-1248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You wanna put pressure on teens/pre-teens in school? You wanna crank up the stress of puberty ANOTHER notch? Wanna make kids who are socially awkward around the opposite sex feel even MORE uncomfortable?

Just go ahead and &quot;bully&quot; them into deciding whether &quot;they must be gay&quot;.
Yeah, thats JUST what adolescent kids need when they are wondering why nobody asked them to be their date on Prom Night.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wanna put pressure on teens/pre-teens in school? You wanna crank up the stress of puberty ANOTHER notch? Wanna make kids who are socially awkward around the opposite sex feel even MORE uncomfortable?</p>
<p>Just go ahead and &#8220;bully&#8221; them into deciding whether &#8220;they must be gay&#8221;.<br />
Yeah, thats JUST what adolescent kids need when they are wondering why nobody asked them to be their date on Prom Night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Day of Silence 2013 by Lion IRC</title>
		<link>http://spiritualfriendship.org/2013/04/19/day-of-silence-2013/#comment-1247</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lion IRC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 01:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritualfriendship.org/?p=359#comment-1247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s my conservative response.

1. ALL bullying of children is wrong. PERIOD! Full stop. Unconditional. No special selection criteria. No child goes to the front of the queue for extra care and protection! If you really DO stand for “equality” don’t claim that your child is more important than mine!

2. Don’t sexualise children. Don’t look at a male school child and contemplate whether they enjoy homosexual acts. Keep disgusting gay activism OUT of schools - especially when it&#039;s camouflaged as isolated concern for &quot;gay children&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my conservative response.</p>
<p>1. ALL bullying of children is wrong. PERIOD! Full stop. Unconditional. No special selection criteria. No child goes to the front of the queue for extra care and protection! If you really DO stand for “equality” don’t claim that your child is more important than mine!</p>
<p>2. Don’t sexualise children. Don’t look at a male school child and contemplate whether they enjoy homosexual acts. Keep disgusting gay activism OUT of schools &#8211; especially when it&#8217;s camouflaged as isolated concern for &#8220;gay children&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Once more: on the label &#8216;gay Christian&#8217; by Matt</title>
		<link>http://spiritualfriendship.org/2013/02/01/once-more-on-the-label-gay-christian/#comment-1233</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 18:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritualfriendship.org/?p=310#comment-1233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny because the most compelling argument isn&#039;t to fight over labels; rather, as Christians who are truly seeking union together, we ought to disregard labels altogether. I have a real issue with &quot;gay Christian&quot; as a term. I have an issue with most labels entirely, because one could say, &quot;I&#039;m a white Christian,&quot; or &quot;I&#039;m an African American Christian,&quot; or whatever... but what&#039;s the point?

What&#039;s the agenda?

If the &quot;gay Christian&quot; crowd really wants unity, simply prove it. Toss the label out altogether, because true integrity need not an explanation to skeptical onlookers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny because the most compelling argument isn&#8217;t to fight over labels; rather, as Christians who are truly seeking union together, we ought to disregard labels altogether. I have a real issue with &#8220;gay Christian&#8221; as a term. I have an issue with most labels entirely, because one could say, &#8220;I&#8217;m a white Christian,&#8221; or &#8220;I&#8217;m an African American Christian,&#8221; or whatever&#8230; but what&#8217;s the point?</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the agenda?</p>
<p>If the &#8220;gay Christian&#8221; crowd really wants unity, simply prove it. Toss the label out altogether, because true integrity need not an explanation to skeptical onlookers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Friendship an Unconditional Love? by The Games Christians Play - Fall And Die...</title>
		<link>http://spiritualfriendship.org/2013/04/16/is-friendship-an-unconditional-love/#comment-1229</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Games Christians Play - Fall And Die...]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 00:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritualfriendship.org/?p=351#comment-1229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Is Friendship an Unconditional Love? (spiritualfriendship.org) [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Is Friendship an Unconditional Love? (spiritualfriendship.org) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>