A common refrain I see from certain conservative Christian commentators is that homosexuality is “celebrated” in Western culture and that people are “pressured” into accepting “the homosexual lifestyle.” In some sense, I can see where this perception is coming from. I’m currently studying at a large public university, and I have previously done internships in very gay-friendly corporate settings. In these contexts, I do feel quite a bit of pressure to change my beliefs and to affirm all loving, monogamous relationships, including gay relationships with a sexual component.
There are many ways that this perception is problematic, however. The biggest problem I see is that the pressure is far from being one-sided. Ironically, the same people complaining about pressure to affirm gay relationships are themselves often creating immense pressure in a different direction. This pressure is often encouraging me to go beyond holding to traditional sexual ethics, but also to change the labels I use, to try to change my sexual orientation, or to focus my efforts and attention on opposing the gay-affirming segments of society. In some ways, I feel this sort of pressure more acutely than I do the pressure to affirm sexual gay relationships. Rachel Held Evans recently expressed this point well while discussing some related issues: “We aren’t ‘giving in’ to the culture; our culture is evangelical Christianity. We’re struggling with that culture, and doing so comes with a cost.” The fact of the matter is that the social connections that matter the most to me are those of my brothers and sisters in Christ.
A type of pressure that I most certainly face from my fellow Christians, albeit one that I don’t feel quite as acutely, is pressure to hold onto the same understanding of Scripture that I already have. There’s a great deal of pressure to maintain that sexual relationships between people of the same sex are inherently sinful. This sort of pressure is more obvious when I see the way it plays out when directed towards people who no longer share that belief. As Rachel Held Evans discussed in the same post I linked above, there are often tangible costs to coming to a different conclusion.
To be honest, the pressure I feel most acutely to affirm gay relationships is different than you might expect. I don’t think that what’s most challenging to my beliefs is primarily about whether people will think less of me for holding traditional views, although that sort of fear of man is definitely something I struggle with. I think my beliefs are more challenged by seeing homophobia on the part of people who share some of my theology, by hearing about people who have been deeply sinned against by those affirming traditional teaching, or by hearing from people who have concluded they cannot have an abundant life while celibate. I don’t want to be calloused to the pain of others, even though I want to be faithful to Christian teaching. I don’t think there should be a conflict there, but it sometimes feels as though there is.
Being in the middle of all this pressure is often frustrating. I hope that I am forming my beliefs out of a process of honestly seeking to learn God’s truth and to love others. However, it’s often hard to know what all is going into my process of working through sexuality issues. Do I really believe as I do because I’m as convinced as I think I am, or am I really succumbing to the pressure of my particular faith community? I do very much appreciate accountability and seeking truth in community, but people are fallible, and it’s hard to know my real motivations. The fact of the matter, though, is that there isn’t a “safe” approach for me to take. There will always be pressure for me to approach things differently than I do, and I have to try to seek truth and love despite the difficulties created by the cultural climate I inhabit.
If you make the sort of statement that I mentioned at the beginning of the post, that society celebrates homosexuality, what you’re actually telling me is different from what you’re probably trying to tell me. You’re reminding me that if I change my convictions or enter a gay relationship myself, there is a large community of people who do not hold to a traditional view of sexual ethics and who will welcome me. You’re probably also implicitly telling me that I will not, or at least should not, receive that kind of welcome as a sexual minority person in a Christian community that holds to traditional sexual ethics. Some sexual minority people do believe you and so are actually pressured by your attitude to abandon their convictions. Think before you speak.
Fortunately, I do not believe you myself. I have been blessed with a church and larger Christian community where people treat me as a brother in Christ and are interested in learning from my experience as a sexual minority person who is trying to be faithful to Christian teaching. In this context, I have seen some of the most helpful responses, where it is clear that people care about me and want to help me work through things. When it’s geographically feasible, one of the most helpful things has been when people offer to get together for a meal or coffee. We often have good discussions that get into issues of sexuality among other things. In a face-to-face meeting, it’s clear when a person wants to support or to learn, and it’s clear that they’re not just there to preach at me. I appreciate when people listen, and when they offer their own thoughts within a context where I’m already being open with them. I think it’s important that I have some space to raise doubts, questions, and struggles without being written off. Whether or not we’re able to meet face to face, it’s also helpful when people are open with me about their own situations and questions. There’s some degree of pressure inherent in simply having convictions in the first place, but it’s not so suffocating when I know someone is trying to support me and to help me pursue truth, love, and holiness.
Jeremy Erickson is a Ph.D. student in Computer Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He previously studied Mathematics and Computer Science at Taylor University in Upland, IN.
Thank you for sharing this.
God Bless you, brother! Thank you for sharing this.
At the very beginning of the piece, I would have been more inclined to put in quotes the word “accept,” or later “affirm.”
When people ask me, now, whether I “accept” this or that practice…my go-to answer is to say “I accept that it exists, obviously.”
That’s the strange thing about all this language. The opposite of “accept” isn’t “believe it’s immoral.” The opposite of “accept” is “deny.” To “not accept homosexuality” or something like that often then takes the form of a sort of denial where the person “not accepting” almost wants to deny the existence of the whole thing, but then has to grapple with the fact that it obviously does exist.
Likewise the language of “approve of.” Approving is something the FDA does for medicines. Do I approve of this or that? To me it’s an odd question; why should anyone be holding me as some sort of standard of “approval” for them. Furthermore, lack of “approval” given almost implies that there is going to be some sort of prosecution if anyone “does something without proper approval.”
Whatever happened to simple tolerance? Tolerance in the sense of “Yes I know that happens, other people think it’s good for them, my moral beliefs are different, yet I respect them as people, do not see it as my job to spiritually interfere, and society somehow doesn’t collapse and we both manage to still continue existing in spite of competing realities!”
Good points here. Sadly, “tolerance” is now generally understood as a neutral/indifferent/cold term, rather than what may be sought after; namely, affirming/it’s all OK/warm! So, we are emboldened to stay the course, keep conversing (Latin: conversatio, “to lean in”) and be “tolerant” as well as warm, friendly, and affirming of shared personhood – however we may differ in behavior and belief. Some describe it as “holding your convictions lightly” – which doesn’t mean having NO convictions at all; just, don’t hold them so tightly that life is squeezed out!
Reblogged this on It's a five foot world.
Pingback: More On Coming Out Part 2: How Open Should You Be? | Spiritual Friendship